ABSTRACT
Resumen La cirugía ha pasado de ser una ciencia rudimentaria caracterizada por el padecimiento de insufribles dolores por falta de anestésicos, de realizarse en lugares poco acondicionados y de utilizarse instrumental poco ortodoxo con consecuencias nefastas para el desenlace de los procedimientos debido principalmente a las infecciones, a ser un campo desarrollado donde la tecnología juega un rol trascendental para el objetivo final que es el bienestar del paciente. En las últimas décadas, la cirugía ha pasado del acceso abierto al laparoscópico, cirugía por orificios naturales (NOTES), cirugía laparoscópica de puerto único, hasta la cirugía robótica. Es un hecho que estamos en un momento de la historia de la humanidad en el cual el desarrollo de las tecnologías a cambiado nuestra vida cotidiana, así como también el de nuestra practica quirúrgica diaria y no podemos ser ajenos a esta. El propósito de esta revisión es mostrar la situación actual de la cirugía robótica gastrointestinal y sus perspectivas a futuro. Para esto se realizó una búsqueda en la base de datos medline con las palabras claves "review robotic surgery, robotic digestive surgery, robotic bariatric surgery, robotic esophagectomy, robotic gastrectomy, robotic hepatectomy, robotic pancreatectomy, robotic hernia repair". Además una búsqueda de datos en la web sobre "intutive investorpresentation, future of robotic surgery, digital surgery, new robotic system in surgery, trends in robotic surgery".
It is a fact that we are at a moment in the history of humanity in which the development of technologies has changed our daily lives, as well as that of our daily surgical practice. The fast evolution in technology has allowed surgery to evolve from a rudimentary science characterized by painful, highly invasive procedures, to a rapidly developing and precise field with ever improving patient outcomes. In recent decades, gastrointestinal surgery has gone from open access to laparoscopy, natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), single-port laparoscopic surgery, and more recently, robotic assisted surgery. The purpose of this review is to show the current situation of robotic gastrointestinal surgery and its future prospects. A literature review was conducted in the Medline database with the keywords "revision of robotic surgery, robotic digestive surgery, bariatric robotic surgery, robotic esophagectomy, robotic gastrectomy, robotic hepatectomy, robotic pancreatectomy, robotic hernia repair". In addition, online search engine data was conducted using the following key words "intutive investor presentation, future of robotic surgery, digital surgery, new robotic system in surgery, trends in robotic surgery"
Subject(s)
Humans , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/trends , Robotic Surgical Procedures/trends , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Robotics/instrumentation , Laparoscopy/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
La derivación biliopancreática con cruce duodenal (BPD-DS) es el procedimiento bariátrico que ha mostrado los mejores resultados en cuanto a pérdida de peso y resolución de comorbilidades. Sin embargo, su adopción ha sido lenta, principalmente debido a sus complicaciones nutricionales y dificultad técnica. Dado esto, algunos autores han propuesto variaciones de este procedimiento. Estas están basadas en disminuir las anastomosis a solo una, y realizarla con un asa tipo loop (sin derivación biliopancreática). Estos cambios podrían reproducir las ventajas del BPD-DS, y eliminar algunas de sus desventajas. En este artículo, mostramos los resultados de estas variaciones comparadas con el BPD-DS, y cómo sus resultados prometedores pueden tener como consecuencia una nueva aproximación a la población que sufre de obesidad y sus comorbilidades
Biliopancreatic Diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is the bariatric surgery that has shown the better results regarding long-term weight loss and comorbidities resolution. Nevertheless, BPD-DS' adoption has been slow, mainly due to its nutritional complications, and technical complexity. Given this, some authors have proposed surgical variations of this effective procedure. These new procedures are based on reducing the anastomosis to only one, and doing it just a loop anastomosis (no biliopacreatic diversion). These changes might bring to us the advantages of BPD-DS, and eliminate some of its disadvantages. In this article, we show the results of these variations compared with BPD-DS, and how their promising results could be a new approach for obese population and bariatric surgery.
Subject(s)
Humans , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Biliopancreatic Diversion/methods , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Duodenum/surgerySubject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Adenocarcinoma , Bronchial Neoplasms/pathology , Bronchial Neoplasms , Pulmonary Atelectasis , Clinical Evolution , Bronchial Neoplasms/secondary , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Pneumonia , Airway Obstruction/etiology , Radiography, Thoracic , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedSubject(s)
Humans , Male , Adolescent , Intestinal Volvulus/diagnosis , Intestinal Volvulus/pathologyABSTRACT
Background: The endoscopic view of the gastric cardia could be related with the manometric competence of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and with pathological gastroesophageal reflux. Aim: To compare the endoscopic aspect of the cardia with the results from esophageal manometry and 24 h esophageal pH monitoring. Materials and Methods: The cardia of a group of 150 patients (aged 19 to 72 years, 89 women) with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms was classified as normal or open, during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. All subjects were subjected to a manometric study to measure LES pressure and determine LES incompetence and to a 24 h esophageal pH measurement. Results: LES pressure was 14.7±6.2 and 8.7±4.2 mmHg in patients with normal and open cardia, respectvively (p <0.001). Likewise, 43 and 79% of patients with normal and open cardia had an incompetent LES, respectively (p <0.001). Pathological acid reflux was present in 43 and 71% of patients with normal or open cardia, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusions: The endoscopic appearance of the cardia can identify patients with pathological gastroesophageal reflux.